GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11:41 Mar 12, 2021 |
Danish to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Insurance / pleading | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Adrian MM. Austria | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Discussion entries: 3 | |
---|---|
være nærmest til i første række selv be the one closest in line as such /an insider / Explanation: vs. the proximate cause of the loss itself. or colloquially: primary AmE contender BrE candidate in ... considering for itself in the first place whether... Virksomheden har været... surely in tense: the business insured had been.. rather than should > må, skal, skulde or skulle > have been.... Reference: http://www.leaderboard.com/GLOSSARY_CLOSEST |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
The company were themselves the immediate party to first of all consider.... Explanation: I assume that it is a defensive statement - meaning 'they were the first to consider'??? if not perhaps 'should have been' would be better |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
The insurer as the insuring party incurred in negligence for failing to consider whether Explanation: This is a long shot but here goes: The insurer as the insuring party incurred in negligence for failing to consider whether a - clearly restricted - coverage of "third-party online banking burglary" was insufficient for its customer as the insured party. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 6 hrs (2021-03-12 17:49:51 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Misunderstood the redundancy in the misleading "virksomhed" part. A reinterpretation would then be: The insured party incurred in negligence for failing to consider whether - clearly restricted - "third-party online banking burglary" coverage was sufficient to meet its cybercrime coverage requirements. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 6 hrs (2021-03-12 18:12:09 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- tweaking the "virksomhed" part: The insured company incurred in negligence for failing to consider whether - clearly restricted - "third-party online banking burglary" coverage was sufficient to meet its cybercrime coverage requirements. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.