Glossary entry (derived from question below)
German term or phrase:
umfangreiches Akkreditierungsverfahren
English translation:
comprehensive accreditation procedure
German term
umfangreiches Akkreditierungsverfahren
Auftrag zur Tätigkeit als benannte Stelle im Rahmen des Gesetzes (§ 3 SCHIG-Gesetz) - derzeit umfangreiches Akkreditierungsverfahren
How is "umfangreich" to be interpreted "substantial" or "lengthy"?
3 +6 | comprehensive | Giovanni Rengifo |
4 | drawn-out, lengthy | Ventnai |
3 +1 | extensive accreditation procedure | Dr. Julian Keogh |
Apr 3, 2009 07:42: Steffen Walter changed "Field" from "Marketing" to "Law/Patents"
Apr 4, 2009 18:03: Steffen Walter changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/127434">Martin Wenzel's</a> old entry - "umfangreiches Akkreditierungsverfahren"" to ""comprehensive""
Apr 4, 2009 18:21: Giovanni Rengifo changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/34047">Steffen Walter's</a> old entry - "umfangreiches Akkreditierungsverfahren"" to ""comprehensive accreditation procedure""
Non-PRO (1): Helen Shiner
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
comprehensive
drawn-out, lengthy
extensive accreditation procedure
agree |
Steffen Walter
: I believe either "comprehensive" or "extensive" would fit here.
15 hrs
|
Something went wrong...