Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
affirming previously disadvantaged groups
Spanish translation:
acción afirmativa a favor de colectivos anteriormente marginados
Added to glossary by
Bubo Coroman (X)
Jun 10, 2009 22:31
14 yrs ago
8 viewers *
English term
affirming previously disadvantaged groups
English to Spanish
Other
Idioms / Maxims / Sayings
XXXX seeks to protect the right to:
- human dignity;
- fair treatment (subject to considerations of *affirming previously disadvantaged groups*);
- freedom and security of person;
- human dignity;
- fair treatment (subject to considerations of *affirming previously disadvantaged groups*);
- freedom and security of person;
Proposed translations
(Spanish)
References
creo que tiene que ver con este concepto | jacana54 (X) |
Change log
Jun 18, 2009 05:50: Bubo Coroman (X) Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+2
6 hrs
Selected
acción afirmativa a favor de colectivos anteriormente marginados
te remito a la referencia de Lucía y a los resultados de esta búsqueda, según loscuales donde se usa "affirmative action" en inglés, en español se usa "acción afirmativa":
http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q="affirmative action" +ac...
en los resultados de esta nueva búsqueda puedes ver ejemplos del uso de expresiones tales como "acción afirmativa a favor de las mujeres", "acción afirmativa a favor de los jóvenes", etc.:
http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q="acción afirmativa a fav...
http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q="affirmative action" +ac...
en los resultados de esta nueva búsqueda puedes ver ejemplos del uso de expresiones tales como "acción afirmativa a favor de las mujeres", "acción afirmativa a favor de los jóvenes", etc.:
http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q="acción afirmativa a fav...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks Deborah! "
12 mins
sosteniendo aquéllos grupos con desventajas iniciales
38 mins
apoyar a los grupos que antes eran marginales/carenciados/gozaban de menos recursos
marginal: 4. adj. Dicho de una persona o de un grupo: Que vive o actúa, de modo voluntario o forzoso, fuera de las normas sociales comúnmente admitidas. (Dicc. de la RAE)
+1
2 hrs
favorecer a grupos históricamente/anteriormente carenciados
Sólo otra versión más
Peer comment(s):
agree |
jacana54 (X)
: Chris, ¿qué te parecería "promover"?, que tal vez no tenga las connotaciones que podría tener "favorecer"
12 hrs
|
Me parece buena idea. Gracias!
|
2 hrs
apoyar o fortalecer a grupos previamente desfavorecidos
slds
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2009-06-11 01:26:42 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
o menos favorecidos
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2009-06-11 01:26:42 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
o menos favorecidos
Reference comments
1 hr
Reference:
creo que tiene que ver con este concepto
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/affirmative-action/
“Affirmative action” means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded. When those steps involve preferential selection—selection on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity—affirmative action generates intense controversy.
The development, defense, and contestation of preferential affirmative action has proceeded along two paths. One has been legal and administrative as courts, legislatures, and executive departments of government have made and applied rules requiring affirmative action. The other has been the path of public debate, where the practice of preferential treatment has spawned a vast literature, pro and con. Often enough, the two paths have failed to make adequate contact, with the public quarrels not always very securely anchored in any existing legal basis or practice.
“Affirmative action” means positive steps taken to increase the representation of women and minorities in areas of employment, education, and business from which they have been historically excluded. When those steps involve preferential selection—selection on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity—affirmative action generates intense controversy.
The development, defense, and contestation of preferential affirmative action has proceeded along two paths. One has been legal and administrative as courts, legislatures, and executive departments of government have made and applied rules requiring affirmative action. The other has been the path of public debate, where the practice of preferential treatment has spawned a vast literature, pro and con. Often enough, the two paths have failed to make adequate contact, with the public quarrels not always very securely anchored in any existing legal basis or practice.
Peer comments on this reference comment:
agree |
Christine Walsh
: Con toda seguridad!
46 mins
|
Gracias, saludos.
|
|
agree |
Bubo Coroman (X)
: concuerdo con Chris
5 hrs
|
Gracias, saludos.
|
Something went wrong...