http://is.gd/S2MYfX => '[...] people's assessors (lay judges)'

http://is.gd/v5CGy8 => 'Kudeshkina zat samen met twee leken-rechters.'

http://www.prison.org/english/rpsjur.htm => '[...] a court consisting either of a judge and two lay assessors or a judge and 12 jurors [...]'


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 10 days (2012-04-16 09:17:42 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------

An excellent example can be found here:

http://www.lprc.kz/en/images/stories/pdf/Lay adjudication of...

This paper contains a clear explanation of the difference between a 'jury' system and 'lay assessment':


"Lay adjudication in criminal matters can be defined as the practice of allowing citizens who may not have formal legal training to decide the guilt or innocence of the accused. This participation may occur in a system where ordinary citizens share the decision-making power with a judge or panel of judges, or when citizens alone have the ability to serve as factfinders. The second category refers to the jury system that serves as the predominant model of criminal adjudication in the United States and other common law countries. The first model, in which the participating citizens are called 'people’s assessors' or 'lay assessors' is a hallmark of the
Soviet system of criminal adjudication that remains in use today in several countries of the former Soviet Union."

Note the distinction between the 'second system': jury - US and other common law countries, and the 'first model': people's assessors - Soviet system.