Jun 23, 2013 02:56
10 yrs ago
1 viewer *
English term

power generation

English Tech/Engineering Energy / Power Generation
Achievement of 10 million kW power generation

This is the histry of a power plant.

In this case is power geration appropriate? Or it should be output?

Thank you very much.
Change log

Jun 23, 2013 09:13: Tony M changed "Field (specific)" from "Mechanics / Mech Engineering" to "Energy / Power Generation"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

Non-PRO (1): Edith Kelly

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Discussion

Mitsuko Yoshida (asker) Jun 24, 2013:
To Terry and Richards: Thank you so much for the comments. I like GW too. But million kW has been already used. This time they want to chage the brochure partly.
Terry Richards Jun 24, 2013:
I Agree... ...with Henk.
Henk Sanderson Jun 24, 2013:
This remark... ... sheds a whole new light on the situation. If it is about restoring the generating capacity of a power plant, (was it a hydro-electric generator?) then the terms are correct and plausible. I would prefer to use 1 GW i.s.o. 1 million kW.
Mitsuko Yoshida (asker) Jun 23, 2013:
How about the following

Restoration of 1 million kW of generating capacity

It was 1 million not 10 milllion. And there was the fact that the power generators were damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake and stopped operation. I am sorry that I could not checked out.
Tony M Jun 23, 2013:
@ airmailrpl I agree with Henk: although in the strict scientific sense what you say is of course undeniably correct, in normal language we talk almost invariably about 'power generation' etc. etc.
Henk Sanderson Jun 23, 2013:
@ airmailrpl In terms of physics, you are completely right. However in the language domain, the problem is that 'power generation' is a widely used expression: about 29 million(!) Google hits, whereas énergy generation' only delivers 4 M hits
airmailrpl Jun 23, 2013:
Power is NOT generated..Energy is Generated n physics, energy is defined as the amount of work that can be performed by force, whereas power is defined as the rate at which work is performed.

Energy is the capacity to do work.
Power is the rate at which work is done, or energy is transmitted.

Energy generated can be stored whereas power cannot.

Since power is energy per unit of time, in theory it can be calculated after measuring the energy used per second

Transformation OF Energy
Various devices can be used to convert one form of energy into another
Power cannot be converted or transformed.
http://www.diffen.com/difference/Energy_vs_Power
Tony M Jun 23, 2013:
@ Asker Sue, from the way you have phrased your question, I get the impression you are asking us to validate something you may have written yourself in EN?

If so, then you should be aware that, quite apart from the specific point you ask about, there are several other points in this sentence that would benefit from review; as it stands, it doesn't read like very natural EN at all.
Henk Sanderson Jun 23, 2013:
@ Terry: You are completely correct. I did not intend to make this a physics lesson, but the problem is that in colloquial English 'power' is used for both kW and kWh.
Terry Richards Jun 23, 2013:
Units kW is a measurement of instantaneous power generation. kWh is power generated over time.

So, if they mean that the power station was upgraded to produce 10 GW (10 million kW) then the units are correct. This is very unlikely unless it is one of the biggest power plants in the world and this upgrade was very recent.

What is much more likely is that they meant that the plant had produced 10 GWh (10 million kWh) up to that point in its life.

kW is an instantaneous amount (like speed in your car - shown on the speedometer).

kWh is a total amount of energy produced (equivalent to the total number of km your car has travelled as shown on the odometer).

Responses

+4
3 hrs
Selected

power generation

The term itself is ok. But the unit is not ok, it should read: kWh in stead of kW.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2013-06-23 09:18:16 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

As seen from the comments, this certainly isn't a non-Pro question...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 day2 hrs (2013-06-24 05:52:07 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

After the discussion entry of Sue-my, I go for power generating capacity
Note from asker:
Thank you very much. And many thanks for all the comments here.
Peer comment(s):

agree Jack Doughty
57 mins
Thanks, Jack
agree Charles Davis : Yes, "power generation" is fine, but I don't agree about the unit; the capacity of a power plant is measured in watts or multiples of watts. In this case it would be better to say "10 GW" (1 GW being 1 million kW).
2 hrs
Both words 'achievement' and 'history' hint on the total production of the plant, not on its capacity, so the unit MUST be a multiple of Wh
agree Tony M : Yes, in the light of new capacity, it is now clear we are talking about 'generating capacity' -- the word 'power' being arguably redundant.
3 hrs
Thanks, Tony
agree Edith Kelly
5 hrs
Thanks, Edith; still a 'non-Pro' question?
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thank you very much. And many thanks for all the comments here"
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search