Dec 18, 2017 18:27
6 yrs ago
4 viewers *
French term
la tête de Pareto
French to English
Tech/Engineering
Manufacturing
Quality control
I'm interested in this expression on the link below, many thanks
http://christian.hohmann.free.fr/index.php/six-sigma/les-out...
http://christian.hohmann.free.fr/index.php/six-sigma/les-out...
Proposed translations
(English)
4 | the head of the Pareto chart | philgoddard |
4 +1 | Pareto's vital few | Daniel Frisano |
4 | Pareto's top end | Didier Fourcot |
Proposed translations
5 mins
Selected
the head of the Pareto chart
"A Pareto chart is an ordered histogram where the few categories with highest occurrences are on the left side (the head), and the many categories with few occurrences are on the right side (the tail)."
Note from asker:
many thanks! |
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "thank you"
+1
2 hrs
Pareto's vital few
Frequently found as "Pareto chart vital few": the first few causes that are responsible for most of the interesting cases, roughly described according to the 20/80 rule.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Didier Fourcot
: Also possible, seen here "vital few against trivial many": http://www.whatissixsigma.net/pareto-chart-and-analysis/
13 hrs
|
16 hrs
Pareto's top end
Seen in this reference:
https://www.businessballs.com/self-management/paretos-80-20-...
So even where a situation does contain a 80:20 correlation, other ratios might be more significant, for example:
99:22 (illustrating that even greater concentration than 80:20 and therefore significance at the 'top-end') or
5:50 (i.e., just 5% results or benefit coming from 50% of the input or causes or contributors, obviously indicating an enormous amount of ineffectual activity or content).
https://www.businessballs.com/self-management/paretos-80-20-...
So even where a situation does contain a 80:20 correlation, other ratios might be more significant, for example:
99:22 (illustrating that even greater concentration than 80:20 and therefore significance at the 'top-end') or
5:50 (i.e., just 5% results or benefit coming from 50% of the input or causes or contributors, obviously indicating an enormous amount of ineffectual activity or content).
Something went wrong...