Sep 7, 2022 18:23
1 yr ago
26 viewers *
English term

dissectable

English Science Livestock / Animal Husbandry Spelling query
UK. I'm revising and correcting the 2nd draft of an article that was submitted in British English and returned to the (non-native) authors by the journal, asking for clarification about some points. Although the journal's guidelines do not stipulate any particular variant of English, the draft returned by the journal is in a mix of US and UK English, and to make matters worse, whoever reviewed it in the journal has inserted errors (for example,"yelow" with one L. I know that American English usually avoids double consonants, but not in the case of yellow). The MS Word spellchecker is underlining "dissectable", and suggesting "dissectible", and my query is whether the distinction between the two forms is a UK-US thing, or if they are both acceptable in either variant. FWIW, the latter gets 140,000 hits and "dissectable" gets only 41,000, which usually indicates a UK-US difference, owing to the vast numbers of American English speakers. I'm just looking for confirmation.

"In addition, dissectable fat (DF; subcutaneous and intermuscular) did not present differences between genotypes."

Responses

+1
32 mins
Selected

they're just alternative spellings

dissectible
Alternative spelling of dissectable
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dissectible

Since, as you say, dissectible is by far the more common spelling, I'd stick with that. I can't find any evidence that it's a UK/US difference.
Note from asker:
Me neither, and I actually prefer "dissectible" anyway. After consulting with the client, we're submitting the UK English version again, with all the reviewer's errors corrected.
Peer comment(s):

agree ezpz
23 mins
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thanks again for your comments."
-1
2 hrs

dissectible is, while dissectable is capable of being dissected

As adjectives, the difference between dissectible and dissectable is that dissectible is, while dissectable is capable of being dissected.

https://wikidiff.com/dissectable/dissectible
Note from asker:
What phil said. I came across this link myself yesterday and decided it was useless.
Peer comment(s):

disagree philgoddard : This is meaningless - wikidiff is written by bots and very unreliable.
17 mins
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search