This question was closed without grading. Reason: Other
Apr 9, 2023 19:23
1 yr ago
17 viewers *
English term
de-risking of NPO
English to Russian
Other
Other
Terrorism Financing
Bank de-risking of the NPO sector
Problem
NPOs around the world are impacted by issues of financial access – inordinate delays in cash transfers, onerous due-diligence requirements, inability to open bank accounts and arbitrary closure of bank accounts – collectively classed as ‘de-risking’ activities by financial institutions.
Impact
NPOs are
- spending more time getting transactions processed or having difficulty on-boarding as a client
- unaware of systemic drivers behind decisions by banks (including on closing down accounts)
- impacted more based on size, so smaller organizations more affected than larger ones. Also, small organizations are not able to cope with banks’ extended due diligence requirements.
- There is little or no recourse to remedy for them
- seeing an increase in workload for their financial staff, varying from 35 per cent to 100 per cent compared to five years ago
- all being tainted with the same brush as a consequence of the bad behavior of a few
- seeking/finding their own solutions for problems and issues with their bank (one-off, and not systemic)
Consequence
No delivery of food, medicine, education
Cancelled projects, less services for communities, etc.
Resources spent on bank transactions rather than missions
Damage to reputation
Limited ability to raise funds for NPO services nationally and across borders
Problem
NPOs around the world are impacted by issues of financial access – inordinate delays in cash transfers, onerous due-diligence requirements, inability to open bank accounts and arbitrary closure of bank accounts – collectively classed as ‘de-risking’ activities by financial institutions.
Impact
NPOs are
- spending more time getting transactions processed or having difficulty on-boarding as a client
- unaware of systemic drivers behind decisions by banks (including on closing down accounts)
- impacted more based on size, so smaller organizations more affected than larger ones. Also, small organizations are not able to cope with banks’ extended due diligence requirements.
- There is little or no recourse to remedy for them
- seeing an increase in workload for their financial staff, varying from 35 per cent to 100 per cent compared to five years ago
- all being tainted with the same brush as a consequence of the bad behavior of a few
- seeking/finding their own solutions for problems and issues with their bank (one-off, and not systemic)
Consequence
No delivery of food, medicine, education
Cancelled projects, less services for communities, etc.
Resources spent on bank transactions rather than missions
Damage to reputation
Limited ability to raise funds for NPO services nationally and across borders
Proposed translations
29 mins
снижение рисков, связанных с деятельностью НКО
4.3.4. Снижение рисков
Риски в деятельности НКО могут быть снижены путем внедрения новых методов и способов контроля, проведения мероприятий по снижению вероятности возникновения рисков, проведение превентивных мероприятий, направленных на снижение размера возможного убытка.
Снижение рисков, совместно с процедурами по идентификации, мониторингу и контролю, является основным инструментом по управлению рисками в НКО.
https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd...
Риски в деятельности НКО могут быть снижены путем внедрения новых методов и способов контроля, проведения мероприятий по снижению вероятности возникновения рисков, проведение превентивных мероприятий, направленных на снижение размера возможного убытка.
Снижение рисков, совместно с процедурами по идентификации, мониторингу и контролю, является основным инструментом по управлению рисками в НКО.
https://www.google.ru/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd...
7 hrs
Меры по управлению рисками / меры по ограничению рисков некоммерческих организацийи
Меры по управлению рисками финансирования террористической деятельности в секторе некоммерческих организаций
Discussion
Consequence
No delivery of food, medicine, education
Cancelled projects, less services for communities, etc.
Resources spent on bank transactions rather than missions
Damage to reputation
Limited ability to raise funds for NPO services nationally and across borders
Где и когда меры по снижению риска приводили к подобным последствиям, причем не из серии "упс", а именно ожидаемым, неизбежным??? Перечислено то, чем однозначно кончается дерискинг.
Включите логику.
Здесь речь о мерах предпринимаемых банком для ограничению рисков
de-risk
verb
gerund or present participle: de-risking
(especially in a business context) take steps to make (something) less risky or less likely to involve a financial loss.
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=lang_en&q=de-risking
По результатам прошедших заседаний Целевой группы по стратегическому обзору работы ФАТФ (AGSR) принято решение о создании проектной группы для разработки мер реагирования на непреднамеренные последствия применения стандартов ФАТФ, в частности, злоупотребления в плане избыточного давления на добросовестные НКО, дерискинг, финансовая изоляция и ограничение прав человека.
Или вот еще: https://rg.ru/2016/09/20/pavle-livadnyj-terroristy-izbegaiut...
https://www.state.gov/de-risking/#:~:text=De-risking refers ...
What is the term de-risking?
De-risking refers to the phenomenon of financial institutions terminating or restricting business relationships with clients or categories of clients to avoid, rather than manage, risk.