01:29 Jun 20, 2002 |
English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Selected response from: Petra Molenaar | |||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +2 | theories were considered anarchistic |
| ||
3 +3 | Well, no. This really doesn't quite read right at all... |
| ||
4 +1 | More possible deciphering |
| ||
4 | anarchic |
| ||
3 | * |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
anarchic Explanation: Anarchy-like is not totally incorrect, but I don't think it's a good choice from a point of view of style. I'm also wondering about "the most important idea was ..." I don't think it's an idea here but a fact. Maybe: from then on what stood out was that these relations had become anarchic. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2002-06-20 01:41:10 (GMT) -------------------------------------------------- I\'m also not sure about \"these relations.\" Maybe it would become clearer to us, if we knew what the phrase is referring to. Which relations? would be a natural question for a reader without more context. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
* Explanation: The whole sentence seems a tad odd; maybe it's because I'm missing the context. Anarchy-like is understandable but anarchistic or anarchic would be preferable, IMHO. |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
theories were considered anarchistic Explanation: I think that relations is not the best way to describe te words universalism and solidarism....maybe you would like to consider the word theories, or use the words concepts again... Petra |
| ||||||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||||||
1 hr confidence: peer agreement (net): +3
|