Presentation	Welcome Address	Time: 13:00 to 13:10
Presentation	Legal Issues Surrounding Machine Translation and Data Privacy	Time: 13:15 to 13:55
Panel	The Lawyer-Linguist as Interpreter	Time: 14:00 to 14:55
Panel	Translating Across Legal Systems	Time: 15:00 to 15:55
Presentation	Areas of Opportunity for Lawyer-Linguists in the International Human Rights Arena	Time: 16:00 to 16:55
Virtual powwow	“Ask the Lawyer-Linguist” Chatroom	Time: 17:00 to 19:30
Panel	Training for Lawyer-Linguists	Time: 17:05 to 17:55
Panel	The Multilingual Law Student	Time: 18:05 to 18:50
Presentation	Closing remarks	Time: 18:55 to 19:05
On-demand presentation	The Role of the Lawyer-Linguist in the Language Services Industry	Time: 19:00 to 19:05
On-demand presentation	Working as a Freelance Lawyer-Linguist for the UN, States and Other Non-State Actors	Time: 19:05 to 19:10
On-demand presentation	The Lawyer-Linguist as CEO	Time: 19:15 to 19:20
On-demand presentation	Working as a Lawyer-Linguist for the European Court of Justice (Freelancers and In-House)	Time: 19:20 to 19:25
On-demand presentation	Maintaining a Law Practice as a Lawyer-Linguist	Time: 19:30 to 19:35

I loved it.It was quite dynamic,useful and informative.

---

Very interesting, indeed! Kind regards, Emanuela

---

Bunch of thanks.

---

After an initial brief period of technical difficulties with the audio; I thought the presentation was not only well -presented and interesting, but that it also offered a lot of useful and new information, as well. Thanks again for this well-received yearly event, Suzanne: keep up the good work!

---

Great presentation and very useful!

---

Really interesting and many personal questions found answers. For future events, I hope that technical problems will be less important... A great moment

---

Leave feedback → - View all feedback →

Search chat logs

Search:

Chat session: All sessions“Ask the Lawyer-Linguist” Chatroom

Show my chats only

Chat session is based on session start and end time. There may be some overlap.

Time	From	To	Content
17:12 May 28, 2014	István Lengyel: 142959	All	Hi Mitra! I'm glad to hear you like it :)
17:12 May 28, 2014	Mitra Mousavi: 1341220	All	hi
17:12 May 28, 2014	Mitra Mousavi: 1341220	All	metoo
17:12 May 28, 2014	Mitra Mousavi: 1341220	All	:)
17:13 May 28, 2014	Mitra Mousavi: 1341220	All	generally program loading is easy
17:13 May 28, 2014	Mitra Mousavi: 1341220	All	for computer
17:48 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	Hi again, I have a question related to TMs in server projects. So, while using the server we usually use a TM for each job. We also want to keep a general, "master" TM for that client/ongoing
17:49 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	is there a way of automatically updating that master TM? Or should we export the project TM into a tmx and update the master TM from there?
17:50 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	I'm just worried that doing this might introduce duplicates or other imprecisions in the master TM, which we intend to be authoritative and squeaky clean
17:52 May 28, 2014	Lexie Sabota: 1772099	All	HI Joao, At the end of the project, you can update the master TM at once by pressing the 'Update and confirm' option within a server project.
17:52 May 28, 2014	Lexie Sabota: 1772099	All	This will ensure that the latest and reviewed translations are added to the TM
17:53 May 28, 2014	Lexie Sabota: 1772099	All	Also, in memoQ 2014, you can set an automated task so that the master TM will be updated automatcially when the project finishes. This is part of the templates option
17:56 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	I just have to set the master TM as primary first and then update & confirm, right?
18:11 May 28, 2014	Lexie Sabota: 1772099	All	correct
18:16 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	Thank you Lexie :)
18:17 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	One more, if someone has the time
18:17 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	Regarding sliced documents in server projects: For some projects with crazy deadline, we sometimes have to slice a document to perform review with 2 people on the same doc.
18:17 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	If reviewer 1 confirms a segment that is a repetition on the part assigned to reviewer 2, it will not propagate, correct?
18:18 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	since the segment is already confirmed, it is harder for R2 in this case to see immediately if the segment has already been changed by R1
18:19 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	is there any easy / more obvious way to do this other than relying on the QA consistency check?
18:22 May 28, 2014	Lexie Sabota: 1772099	All	I'm afraid the consistency check is the best way to do this. You can also set up the TM settings to show only the 100% matches from the reviewer
18:22 May 28, 2014	István Lengyel: 142959	All	No, I'm afraid that the consistency check is the only way to make this work. Slicing pretends that there are two documents. The other thing that the reviewer can do is a check for deviations from theT
18:22 May 28, 2014	István Lengyel: 142959	All	... TM - there is a check for segments inserted that are different from what is a 101% match in the TM.
18:23 May 28, 2014	István Lengyel: 142959	All	you see, we are both afraid :)
18:24 May 28, 2014	João Seco: 1708040	All	Maybe the best thing would be to lock the repetitions except one beforehand and just have the PM confirm them in the end